redwitch

πŸ“„ Red Witch – Post-Market Surveillance (PMS) Log

Purpose: The Post-Market Surveillance (PMS) log tracks external reports, user feedback, and research findings relevant to Red Witch. PMS ensures continuous monitoring of safety, privacy, usability, and regulatory compliance, feeding improvements into the SRS, RMF, and QMS.

Procedure Reference: RW-QMS-005 – Post-Market Surveillance Procedure

Last Updated: 2025-10-02 Owner: QA/RA Manager


1. PMS Log Table

PMS ID Source Type Summary Related RMF / SRS Action / Status Review Date Owner Link
PMS-001 Cambridge Report – Minderoo Centre, 2025 External Report / Risk Commercial exploitation of menstrual data by profit-driven cycle tracking apps; privacy, safety, and reproductive rights risks. R-Ext-001, R-Ext-002, R-Ext-003 Include in RMF and SRS as design input; monitor for regulatory updates 2025-10-30 QA/RA Link to Design Input
PMS-002 PMC Review of 49 Studies, 2023 External Report / Design Input Language barriers, technology access limitations, digital literacy challenges, and cultural sensitivity affecting global adoption of menstrual tracking apps. DI-001 to DI-006 Include in SRS and RMF; monitor user adoption metrics 2025-10-30 Product Team Link to Design Input
PMS-003 Women’s Health – Best Period Tracker Apps, 2023 Market Report Comparison of 11 leading apps; highlights FDA clearance gaps, user frustration with monetization, privacy concerns, and new usability features. R-Ext-007, R-Ext-008, R-Ext-009 Add warnings for off-label use; monitor reviews for monetization/privacy; evaluate future roadmap features 2025-10-30 QA/RA + Product Existing Solutions & Market Comparison
PMS-004 Peer-Reviewed Review of Menstrual Tracking Apps (PMC, 2023) External Report / Scientific Literature Academic evaluation of app quality; found limited scientific validation, evidence gaps, and risks of off-label contraceptive use. R-Ext-007, R-Ext-010 Update SRS for evidence transparency; disclaimers on accuracy and intended use 2025-10-30 QA/RA PMC Article

2. PMS Workflow

  1. Identification

    • Sources: Academic research, media reports, regulatory alerts, user feedback, app store reviews.
    • Assign a unique PMS ID to each item.
  2. Documentation

    • Record source, type, summary, potential risk or design input, linked RMF/SRS references, and owner.
  3. Evaluation

    • Determine if the item represents a risk, a new design input, or both.
    • Assign to appropriate team (QA/RA, Product, Development).
  4. Action / Mitigation

    • Update RMF, SRS, or QMS procedures as necessary.
    • Monitor and track outcomes (e.g., app updates, user education materials).
  5. Review & Reporting

    • Conduct PMS reviews quarterly or after major findings.
    • Record updates, new actions, and status in this log.

3. Notes


4. Future Expansion